[texhax] Puzzle: bibtex working when it *shouldn't*!!! ???
Jerry
jerry at seibercom.net
Mon May 7 13:24:19 CEST 2018
On Mon, 7 May 2018 22:42:56 +1200, Rolf Turner stated:
>On 07/05/18 21:00, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
>
>> Am Mon, 7 May 2018 10:37:06 +1200 schrieb Rolf Turner:
>>
>>> So has anyone any explanation as to why one can get away with the
>>> spurious/redundant ".bib" when running bibtex from the command line,
>>> but not when running it under MiKTeX?
>>
>> miktex is simply different. bibtex there always add the extension.
>> So while in texlive you can use the (wrong) syntax
>> \bibliography{references.bib} it won't work with miktex.
The fact that you can use the wrong syntax and still get it to work is
troubling.
>OK. Thanks. I might have known that a Micro$oft oriented piece of
>software would cause problems.
This has nothing to do with Microsoft. It is a coding problem.
>At least I'll know in future to watch out for this.
Problem solved, although you might want to file a PR against this behavior.
>I remain a bit puzzled as to why the TeXLive bibtex *said* it was using
>"Database file #1: references.bib.bib", but didn't mind not finding that
>file.
Coding error.
>I guess I'll just have to write this off as one more of the many things
>I don't understand about Life, the Universe, and Everything. :-)
--
Jerry
More information about the texhax
mailing list